Thursday, March 23, 2006

american taliban

so now it’s illegal to get drunk at a bar in texas. this is yet another example of the american taliban, the religious right, trying to legislate morality, and micromanage the private lives of citizens who should be free. we need to stand up for the rights of the 2,200 people who have been arrested in bars in texas, simply for the crime of being drunk. they are political prisoners. the state of texas needs to overturn the law that allows police to arrest people in bars for being drunk, because it is simply unconscionable. and we need to stand with the man in afghanistan who faces execution for being an apostate from islam. all of these people deserve monetary compensation from the government for having their civil liberties taken away and being unduly deprived of their freedom, and the pain and suffering of being arrested for a victimless crime. and as for the teacher in florida who had sex with her 14-year-old student and got off without any time in jail, just 3 years house arrest, i agree with the punishment. 14-year-old boys are very sexually curious and attracted towards women who are pretty and have large breasts, such as this teacher, so i don’t see how he could be considered a victim. when i was 14, if a lady like her had sex with me, i would certainly not think there was anything wrong with it. i think what is wrong is how society condemns people like her. you know, the prophet mohammad had sex with young girls, but he was married to them, which means it was perfectly fine (at least that is what a muslim would say about it). but why do we have to be so judgemental of people who have momentary lapses in judgement and impulsively do things we consider wrong? why don’t we consider people’s true character, their heart? now one thing i do know is that this lady was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, which her lawyer claims is an excuse for her behavior, and she pleaded insanity. i was in a mental institution with a lot of bipolar people, and they are not insane or delusional at all, they just have emotional problems. they can still tell right from wrong, which means they are legally sane. now a lot of times they might be a danger to themselves or others, if their emotions get out of control, but this does not make them crazy. so i don’t think insanity is a valid defense for someone who is bipolar. insanity is only a valid defense for people who have some form of psychosis, such as schizophrenia. if you are bipolar you just have really big emotional highs and lows and lowered impulse control, but those things can also be said about people who are drunk. so why isn’t it a legal defense to say “i was drunk”? because people choose to drink, but they don’t choose to be bipolar. anyway, all the people i talked about are innocent, and should be set free and apologized to. for crying out loud, suppose i went to visit my sister in texas, and went out to a bar and got drunk? does that mean i deserve to go to jail? what is this, soviet russia?!? in soviet russia, you don’t get drunk. drunk gets you. john walker lindh must have a big smile on his face about all this. the bastard.

ok here is a link to the story about abdul rahman, the guy in afghanistan. top muslim clerics: convert must die. well guess what, top muslim clerics? YOU must die! you sick fucks. is NOTHING sacred to you, except your stupid religion? you don’t care about human rights, or women’s rights, or people’s right to decide for themselves what to believe in, or the right of people to simply exist and not be killed? and even the “moderate” clerics want abdul rahman killed? i’ll tell you what: these muslim clerics are the scum of the earth, and the enemy of all humanity, including over a billion people who have been forced against their will into the cult of death called “islam”. we see now islam’s true face: they have no decency, no respect for human rights, human dignity, or any sort of freedom whatsoever. they believe that people must “assimilate or die”. these clerics are murderous madmen, and most of their followers are innocent victims of an oppressive system of brainwashing and intimidation. i think the majority of muslims in the world are simply muslim because they would fear for their lives if they converted to another religion, even though deep down, every muslim knows their religion is utterly false and without merit. the war on terrorism IS a war on islam, and we MUST prevail. let us hope that the majority of muslims are peaceful people who will be happy to be liberated from their oppressive religion. we need to start assassinating all of those radical muslim clerics around the world who have murderous rhetoric, and we should be burning korans in the streets, and burning flags with the star and crescent. there is no way to peacefully coexist with these murderous madmen. the religion of islam is the enemy of all who live, ESPECIALLY its own followers. if we allow the less radical islamic clerics who do not preach murder and violence to survive (such as iraq’s ayatollah sistani), while only assassinating those who call for wanton butchery (such as everyone who called for abdul rahman to be executed), we may arrive at a reasonable solution, where islam can still exist, but the only clerics left will be the moderate ones who do not call for violence. and the majority of muslims are just people who were unlucky enough to be born in countries where everyone is required to be muslim, and they are just trying to live their lives peacefully like anyone else. i hope we can find a way to liberate them with a minimal amount of violence, so that they truly can live their lives peacefully and freely without oppression. and if they choose to stick with islam, then fine, but it will have to be a new islam, a 21st century islam, a religion of peace, not the fundamentalist murderous faith found in afghanistan. because, we did not liberate afghanistan from the taliban only to see it fall back into the hands of the same sort of people. they deserve better. and we should see to it that they get something better than the same old taliban. because otherwise, we really didn’t accomplish anything by invading afghanistan, if osama bin laden is still free, al qaeda is still training its operatives, and people in afghanistan are still oppressed under sharia law. and in that case, we might as well pack up and go, and let the terrorists control the entire middle east, since there is no point even trying to liberate people who don’t want to be free. if the people of afghanistan really believe in sharia, and really want taliban-style oppression of everyone, then maybe we should just let them oppress themselves. but, for some strange reason, i still have an odd faith that people everywhere just want to be free. some polling organization should find out whether that is really the case or not, and actually poll the peoople in muslim countries to find out whether they really want to be free or would prefer to be brutally oppressed. then we will know what to do, and we can follow the will of the people.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

wow u make the most ignorant and incorrect statements. american doesn't need bigots like u.

General Public said...

sorry, sometimes i make unjustified generalizations about groups of people, or stuff like that. it’s just a bad habit. luckily people like you can remind me when i have gone astray. that’s why i have comments enabled. thanks for keeping me honest.