Sunday, July 30, 2006

the real mel gibson, just like in south park

well the real mel gibson turns out to be just like the mel gibson that appeared in south park. the crazy, jew-hating, complete lunatic mel gibson that appeared in south park. check out the story. so he thinks the jews are responsible for all the wars in the world. wow. i wonder if that includes world war 2. the jewish banker elite sure was brilliant when it engineered world war 2 for its own enrichment. oh wait? 6 million jews died in the holocaust? well don’t worry, mel gibson’s dad said that none of that ever happened, and mel gibson still looks up to his nazi daddy. and he tried to unzip his pants in the middle of a jail cell to pee in the middle of the floor right in front of a bunch of cops. he called a female cop “sugar tits”. he tried to escape from the police when they were getting him into the police car. and he slammed a telephone so hard it almost broke. and he treated the cops arresting him like dirt, and said he owned malibu and would ruin their lives. and he kept telling one of the cops he would “fuck” her (that was his word, not mine). and of course he was drunk driving. not just a little drunk, but very, very drunk. is this guy a role model? is this the type of person our youth should look up to? is his ultra-violent, anti-semitic movie “the passion” something anybody should ever watch? what is wrong with this dude?

now mel gibson is not a partisan republican, by any means, although he is a far-right-wing christian fundamentalist fanatic. on foreign policy, he is actually opposed to the war in iraq, and he opposes the neocons, since he thinks it is all a jewish conspiracy. he blames everything on the jews. so, when i criticize mel gibson, please note i am not criticizing some guy who is a loyal republican. this dude agrees with me that the war in iraq is a bad thing, and he and i both hate the neocons. it’s just that we hate the neocons for different reasons. i hate them for being stupid warmongers who go around starting wars and can’t ever get anything right, who waste all of our nation’s money on reconstruction projects that fail miserably, with all the money being embezzled by private contractors with no oversight. the war in iraq is basically a giant get-rich-quick scheme to defraud the american taxpayers and funnel the money to a small number of wealthy executives in defense contractors and the oil industry. but, then again, the medicare prescription drug benefit that the republicans enacted is similarly a giant get-rich-quick scheme to funnel taxpayer dollars to enrich the executives of phamaceuticals and hmo’s. now, conspiracies are secretive, and this stuff is all out in the open and publicly known, so i would not exactly call what the republicans are doing a conspiracy. everyone knows they are a bunch of crooks, except that by definition whatever they do is legal, since they write the laws. it is just that everything they do is highly unethical, but since they write the laws and enforce them, they can hold themselves to a much lower ethical standard than they hold anybody else to. anyway, none of this has anything to do with a few people at the top happening to be jewish, or with our alliance with israel, a peaceful, democratic country in the middle east. recently howard dean called the president of iraq an anti-semite for failing to condemn hezbollah as other arab leaders did. and really, everyone should condemn hezbollah, because they are using the lebanese people as human shields to protect themselves from israeli attack. by choosing to locate their military operations in areas which are full of innocent civilians, hezbollah makes it impossible for anyone to attack them without inflicting massive civilian casualties. they always shoot their rockets out of highly populated areas, for instance. now while it is certainly legitimate for people to criticize israel for having a disproportionate response, for killing 10 times as many lebanese as the israelis that are killed, criticism is simply an expression of free speech, and in no way should criticism of israel be interpreted as support for hezbollah, or as anti-semitism. on the other hand, when someone like mel gibson makes broad accusations against the whole of world jewry, this is the same sort of unconstrained anti-semitism that adolf hitler engaged in. when hitler denounced the jews, he denounced all jews, without any ifs, ands, or buts. he did not say “there are certain elements among the jewish population that are destroying germany,” he just went all out and said things like “the jews are destroying germany.” criticism of jews is legitimate only if there is enough nuance present to limit the criticism to only apply it to those individuals guilty of whatever they are accused of. for example, if a person were to denounce certain jews such as paul wolfowitz and joseph lieberman as being ultra-zionist warmongers hell-bent on completely reshaping the middle east, that is a legitimate criticism, as long as you limit it to only those individuals responsible, and do not generalize it to include millions of ordinary civilian jews who had nothing to do with starting the war in iraq. and it is intellectually dishonest to claim that solely the jews are responsible for the war in iraq, when it is evident that there are actually many other non-jewish people who also had a hand in it. for example, condoleezza rice and colin powell both had a hand in starting the war in iraq, but can we really blame black people for starting the war? no. and even pointing out that they are both black is not something worthwhile, because that should not matter. so i say, let us forget about who is jewish and who is not, and instead focus on who wants peace and who wants war, who wants human rights and who wants torture, who wants western civilization to set higher standards for itself than the terrorists, and who wants to fight fire with fire and get down dirty with the terrorists and do everything they do right back to them. the main problem in the war on terror is, we have to try and stop ourselves and our nations and our militaries from becoming as awful and bad as the terrorists we are fighting. we can legitimize attacks against terrorists, even if some innocent civilians are killed. we can come up with moral justifications for torture, if it saves lives of innocent people by finding out about future terrorist actions. the more we legitimize awful things like killing and torture, the more we become like the terrorists. the terrorists also legitimize and justify everything they do, and they think everything they do is morally right. for us to be morally superior, we have to be morally humble, and acknowledge that none of us is a supreme authority on morality, and that sometimes we do make mistakes or do things that are wrong. mel gibson has apologized for his anti-semitic comments, which is good. there is another mel in hollywood who is well known for his anti-semitism, but he gets away with it. the other mel is mel brooks. mel brooks is jewish, so he gets away with insulting jews and writing plays like “the producers” that feature hitler and giant nazi flags. that is because people can tell that mel brooks does not really mean it if he makes fun of jews, because he is one himself. mel gibson, on the other hand, practices the same religion adolf hitler practiced. so, he has a little more explaining to do. perhaps his ideas are more nuanced when he is not drunk, and he does not really hate all of the jews, just the few neocons who got us into iraq. if that is the case, then i forgive him. i just wish he were a little less crazy. and i hope he has not donated any money to hezbollah. maybe the irs should audit him just to make sure he has not donated any money to islamic terrorist organizations. just to be on the safe side, because ya never know who might be supporting terrorists. i mean, heck, your neighbor next door might be a terrorist sympathizer or an al qaeda fundraiser or even a future suicide bomber. anything is possible these days.

and as for whether mel gibson will work in show business again, don’t worry. the jews don’t control show business, and neither do the communists. nowadays, everybody knows that the scientologists control show business. as long as mel gibson does not defame the memory of l. ron hubbard, his hollywood career is fine. but i doubt he will keep many allies on the right wing now that his anti-semitism has been revealed, because the right wing in the united states is trying to seduce the american jewry into becoming republicans, and mel gibson could undermine this whole plan. i hope none of my fellow leftists are foolish enough to embrace mel gibson and his anti-semitism, which might be a temptation to those who oppose the israeli invasion of lebanon. although i disagree with the tactics used by the israelis, i agree with their objective of getting rid of hezbollah. but we would all do well to heed the words of ignignokt, one of the infamous mooninites from aqua teen hunger force: “the innocent shall suffer... big time.” truer words hath never been spaken. ignignokt and err are two of the greatest 2-dimensional philosophers the moon has ever produced. we must all bow before their ineffable wisdom.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

What a dumbass this "numinous ubiquity" is. Even a dumbass name. Mel Gibson spoke the truth about the jews, as his Father did about the Holohoax, as Jesus himself did about the jews, when addressing the jews: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." John 8:44

Anonymous said...

If you want people to read your blog, kindly use proper punctuation, capital letters when necessary, paragraphs, and so on. - Raging Grammarian.

PS. I like Mel Gibson now, and hope he doesn't cave in to his former masters in Hollywitz.

Anchorage Activist said...

Criticism of Jews, like any other group, is constitutionally legitimate 24/7, 365 1/4 days per year. This make moral legitimacy irrelevant.

Your remark about selectivity is on point, though. "Naming the Jew" should not be a scatter-gun, indiscriminate process, but should be a selective process to direct the fight first and foremost to those parts of the overall Jewish community that do the rest of us harm. Groups like the ADL, SPLC, and AIPAC constitute that part of "organized Jewry" that do us the greatest harm by promoting anti-Arab, anti-Muslim, and anti-white hatred and bigotry.

Anonymous said...

End the pigdoggery please. It'll help you guys strike at the core of reality more often.

General Public said...

wow... you anti-semites are such geniuses... i am not a big fan of the jews like you all seem to think, but i do like it when people are treated equally instead of being discriminated against. mel gibson is a lunatic and a drunk driver. i am happy to see you all revealing your true colors by supporting his hatred of jews and agreeing with him. now i know who the nazis are. well, anyway, john a. flynn is a nazi. anchorage activist seems nice enough, not really a nazi. and anonymous is a grammar nazi, almost as bad as a soup nazi. how do you like my capitalization now?!?